Interviewing – Passing the Airport Test, and More

November 16, 2009

What makes for a successful interview?  How do search committees determine airportwho gets an offer?  Of course a lot goes into that equation.  Something that often comes up is the notion of fit.  “We’re looking for the candidate who is the best fit for us,” a search committee says.  Fit may seem like a subjective concept.  So what is “fit,” and how does a job candidate demonstrate it?

To understand fit, it is important to remember where interviewing falls in the job search process.  A search committee has already reviewed a large number of applications.  You have been selected to interview based on things like your CV and cover letter, and perhaps letters of recommendation.  You are usually part of a much smaller pool of interviewees.  At this point of the process there is tacit understanding that anyone being interviewed has the qualifications to do the job, at least on paper.  Interviewing is the in-person test to see who is best — who fits best, given our needs.

Fit becomes even more important with tenure-track jobs, where the assumption is that this might be a lifetime appointment.  Given those stakes, making the right hiring decision becomes even more important.  So just what does fit look like in the context of academic interviewing?

Candidate Qualifications

Certainly one way a search committee assesses fit is continuing to evaluate your academic background and your potential contributions as a scholar.  The interview is your opportunity to place your work as a researcher and teacher in the context of the specific department and institution.  How will your research tap and benefit from the resources available at the institution?  How might your teaching interests mesh with the department, both filling existing needs and perhaps extending course offerings into new areas?  Fit in this case measures your ability to allow the search committee to envision your work in their current environment, to assess you as a professional colleague.

The Airport Test

But fit also involves a more elusive concept.  One employer highlighted the importance of fit this way: If we bring on a new employee, I want to be sure this is someone that I’m comfortable being with.  I want to be sure that if I’m stuck with this person in a 4-hour layover in an airport, I might actually enjoy being with them rather than going crazy being stuck with them.  For this person, fit measures your ability to get along with others.

In an academic interview the “airport test” may come when you are faced with especially tough questions or ornery questioners during your job talk.  How do you handle those situations, and what does that say about you — do you overreact, or are you calm and composed?  During a lunch as part of the interview process, are people enjoying the informal conversation or are they rushing to be done with you?  When faced with the seemingly inevitable administrative snafus of a campus visit, do you handle them gracefully or wear your frustrations on your sleeve?  These situations and more will all be clues to those who interact with you, and will all be a part of the evaluation process.

Fit is a Two-Way Street

Finally, remember that fit does work both ways.  The search committee is evaluating you, but just as importantly, you should be evaluating fit from your position.  Perhaps you do have the qualifications to do the job, but is that enough?  Does the department offer the environment that meets your needs?  Does the institution provide resources to help you reach your goals?  And do you even want to live in the geographic area?  Hopefully you enter the interview process with a clear idea of your needs, to then assess if the particular opportunity fills them.

One More Perspective

I recently heard a faculty member talking about the campus visit.  She talked about the buzz that invariably happens as soon as a job candidate leaves for the final time.  Faculty gather in groups in the hallways sharing their thoughts about the candidate.  I am sure that the buzz is partly about the candidate’s scholarly record and their potential contributions to the department.  But I am equally confident that the buzz is also about those other harder-to-define qualities of fit.

I encourage you to join the discussion.  What are your concerns about demonstrating fit during the interview?  What have you seen or heard that has worked well for candidate?  Leave your comments below.

Photo credit: Joi on Flickr


Highlighting Teaching on Your C.V.

November 2, 2009

We seek candidates with a commitment to undergraduate education, experience chalkboard_houseofsimsteaching students of diverse backgrounds, and a sensitivity to the educational goals of a multicultural population.”
“Commitment to teaching excellence.”
“Having experience with diverse populations or teaching pedagogies.”

Commitment to teaching will be a part of most any job description, as witness these actual job ads — although the amount of commitment will vary by type of institution. So how can you demonstrate a commitment to teaching excellence? Consider these ideas:

Teaching Experience

This one is obvious, but how you include your experiences will impact the perception of your commitment. Where do you place this section and how much space do you allocate to it? What do you choose to emphasize in your descriptions (and do you even have descriptions)? Use this space to make intentional points that demonstrate a commitment to teaching.  This could also be the place to highlight particular experiences that set you apart, for example, designing and teaching your own class.

Student Contact

Consider the various ways you have interacted with students, in graduate school and perhaps even before. Have you mentored students in a lab or other setting? What about tutoring? Highlighting student contact may also help you highlight the diverse types of students you have worked with, majors and non-majors, undergrads and graduate students, etc.  Actual teaching experience is helpful, but all contact with students can help you build your case.

Pedagogical Training

Have you taken specific steps to improve your teaching? Perhaps you’ve attended workshops at CRLT, or even their Preparing Future Faculty seminar. Or maybe you’ve participated in pedagogical trainings in your department. Consider whether and where you want to include these kinds of experiences as a supplement to your teaching experience.  Because while teaching may be a requirement of your graduate experience, pedagogical training can be something that demonstrates commitment beyond what is required.

Your CV will say certain things about your commitment to teaching (or lack thereof). Be sure your document speaks the most important things about you!

What does your document say?

Photo credit: House of Sims on Flickr


Three for Thursday — Cover Letters

October 22, 2009

Today’s “Three for Thursday” focuses on cover letters. A UM faculty member with experience on search committees3 shares these quick tips on the do’s and don’ts of good cover letters:

  1. At the beginning of the letter, do state which position you are applying for (refer to job posting if applicable or explain how you learned about the opening). At the end of the letter, do list all documents included in your packet; if something is sent separately (e.g. reference letters), say so.
  2. Do mention and explain if the position is a particularly good fit for you (with respect to job type, location, etc.) especially if the job is not the obvious top choice for the typical candidate from your institution.
  3. Do not make up reasons for why you are interested in the position; tell the truth. Do not duplicate information from your CV.

What are your cover letter do’s and don’ts, or your questions as you write your letters?  Share your comments below.
Photo credit: CarbonNYC on flickr.


Everything but the Kitchen Sink? Deciding What to Include in Your CV

October 7, 2009

You’ve seen your advisor’s CV — seemingly a dissertation in and of itself. But as a newly minted (or soon-to-be) Ph.D.,kitchen sink what should you include in yours? Or maybe more importantly, what should you leave off? While there are no hard and fast rules to this question, there are guidelines to help you think about what may work best for you.

What are your strongest suits; and what is valued by your discipline?
By the end of the first couple of pages, a reader should have a clear idea of your strengths. These things should come early in your document, and have a relatively larger amount of space devoted to them. This will vary by individual and could include education, research, teaching, awards, or other areas. Your vita is one place where you should not save the best for last.

More than one version may be helpful.
One reason you may be trying the kitchen sink approach is to make sure that you have something in your vita for every type of job and institution. Better to cover all your bases than to potentially leave something out, right? But in reality, including everything may be obscuring what is most important. Is a search committee at Middlebury interested in all the same things as one at Michigan? Hopefully your research can help you understand the needs of your target employers, which will help you develop an effective CV.

When vintage may not be vogue.
Old is sometimes in when it comes to music or even clothes. But a good general rule of thumb is that more recent is better when making your case on your vita. A document that highlights too much from too long ago — experiences, awards, publications, etc. — may send negative messages about your recent accomplishments (or lack thereof). Having said that, even this is not an easy line to draw. An award from a while ago may be truly outstanding and unique, and could add value. A somewhat dated publication may demonstrate a particular aspect of your work that is not addressed anywhere else. As with everything on your document these should all be intentional decisions, including how far back to go.

Ultimately your CV should tell a story: the story of why you are a good fit for the kinds of academic jobs to which you are applying. Your story may be that you are a strong interdisciplinary researcher with a track record of attracting funding for your work. Or maybe that you integrate teaching and research in a number of specific subspecialties in your discipline. Once you can identify your story, you’ll then be able to assess what parts of your background best tell that story — and that will be your kitchen sink!

Photo credit: Roland Tanglao on Flickr


You’re on the Market: Are You Job Search Ready?

September 29, 2009

You’ve decided to enter the academic job market. Congratulations on taking another step on your journey! (After all, runnersone of our slogans at The Career Center is that graduate school is NOT your final destination – even if it may sometimes feel that way.) But what does it mean to be “job search ready?” Consider these important factors as your search begins:

Knowing Yourself and Your Target Market

Much about your search will flow from an understanding of two things, yourself and your target market. How clear are you about these and other key questions:

Yourself

  • What are your perceived strengths and weaknesses?
  • What are your comparative advantages and disadvantages given your discipline?
  • Are there limits or constraints that may impact your job search?
  • What do you value in a job, a department or an institution?

Your Target Job Market

  • How competitive is your field?
  • How broadly or narrowly do you expect your search to be?
  • What hiring criteria are most important in your field?

Creating Strong Job Search Documents

Search committees will begin to assess your candidacy by the documents you provide. CV, cover letter, and statements of teaching philosophy and research interests are the most common job search documents. Being job search ready means having the ability to translate your job goals and your unique strengths into language that is meaningful to faculty search committees.

Viewing Yourself as a Colleague

Part of your success on the academic market will depend on making the mental transition from viewing yourself as graduate student to envisioning yourself (and communicating to others) as an academic colleague. Your job search will give you many opportunities to convince a search committee of your readiness to become a colleague, for example:

  • Talking about your future research plans, moving from a focus on your dissertation to an emphasis on your next projects
  • Communicating teaching interests that help a search committee understand the value you will add to the department, filling potential gaps and moving the department into new areas

Use your cover letters, vita and interviews to portray yourself as a potential colleague with things of value to offer.

As you begin your search, create your own job search readiness checklist. What are your job search strengths? What areas need more attention? Feel free to comment and add your own suggestions.

Photo credit: robertdx on Flickr